CAI Technology
Menu ☰
Annex I — Essential Entities · Transport

✈️NIS2 for Air Transport — deadlines, obligations, fines

Air Transport fall under NIS2 (Directive (EU) 2022/2555 + Romanian Emergency Ordinance 155/2024). See Art.21 obligations, deadlines, max fines and compliance roadmap for Annex I.

Last reviewed: · CAI Technology · echipa Lexnomia + AEGIS

🎯 Who is covered

Air transport — airport operators, air traffic management / air navigation services (ATM/ANS) and air carriers — is listed in Annex I to Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) as a sector of high criticality [C1]. In Romania, transposition was done through OUG 155/2024 (the Romanian Emergency Ordinance transposing NIS2, signed 30 December 2024, published in Official Gazette no. 1332 of 31 December 2024); DNSC (the Romanian National Cybersecurity Directorate) is the competent national authority and the national CSIRT [C6]. On top of NIS2, the EASA aviation technical rules overlap: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1645 (applicable from 16 October 2025) and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/203 (applicable from 22 February 2026) — together they form the Part-IS framework for managing information-security risks with an impact on aviation safety [C7][C8]. Practical note: in September 2023 the Commission issued guidance on Art. 4 NIS2, and EASA clarified that Part-IS does NOT qualify as 'lex specialis' under Art. 4 NIS2 — i.e. NIS2 obligations do NOT fall away when Part-IS applies; the two coexist until the Commission decides on formal equivalence [C9].

Examples in Romania

ROMATSA — the sole national air navigation service provider (ANSP)CN Aeroporturi Bucuresti (Otopeni Henri Coanda + Baneasa Aurel Vlaicu)AIBC Cluj — Cluj International AirportAITS Timisoara — Traian Vuia International AirportIasi International AirportTAROM — Compania Nationala de Transporturi Aeriene Romane (Romanian flag carrier)Wizz Air Hungary Ltd. — operations from RomaniaRomaero — Part-145 maintenance organisation

Applicability thresholds

Annex I of NIS2 covers air carriers (per Reg. (EC) 1008/2008), airport managing bodies (per Reg. (EC) 300/2008) and ATC/ATM operators [C1][C12]. The default threshold: medium and large entities (>= 50 staff or turnover / balance-sheet total >= EUR 10 million) are in scope as essential entities; entities below the threshold can be notified individually by DNSC if identified as critical (e.g. Iasi Airport or regional airports with a strategic role) [C1][C6]. For Part-IS, the technical scope is different: the AOC as such is NOT subject to Part-IS, but Part-145 (maintenance), Part-CAMO, Part-ATCO, Part-ATM/ANS, Part-ADR (aerodromes) and Part-21 (production/design) organisations are [C10]. In practice, a group such as CN Aeroporturi Bucuresti has NIS2 obligations (as an essential entity) plus Part-IS on the ADR side; a carrier such as TAROM falls under NIS2 (the AOC) plus Part-IS on the Part-145 portion (in-house maintenance).

📅 Regulatory timeline

  1. Reg. (EC) 300/2008 — common rules for civil aviation security (anti-unlawful interference) [C12]

  2. Reg. (EU) 2018/1139 — the EASA Basic Regulation, in force from September 2018 [C11]

  3. The Commission adopts Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1645 (Part-IS Delegated) — signed 14 July 2022 [C8]

  4. Adoption of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) [C1]

  5. The Commission adopts Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/203 (Part-IS Implementing) [C7]

  6. The Commission publishes the guidance on Art. 4(1) NIS2 — sector-specific Union legal acts [C9]

  7. EU deadline for transposing NIS2 into national law (NIS2 Art. 41) [C2]

  8. NIS1 (Directive 2016/1148) repealed; NIS2 takes effect [C2]

  9. Romania publishes OUG 155/2024 in Official Gazette no. 1332 of 31 December 2024 (Romanian Emergency Ordinance transposing NIS2); DNSC designated as competent authority [C6]

  10. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1645 (Part-IS Delegated) becomes applicable for Part-21 and Part-ADR [C8]

  11. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/203 (Part-IS Implementing) becomes applicable for Part-145, Part-CAMO, Part-ORO, Part-ATCO, ATM/ANS, ATO [C7]

📋 Key obligations

ICT risk-management framework (NIS2 Art. 21(2) + Part-IS ISMS)

effort: high

NIS2 Art. 21(2) imposes the ten minimum measures (a-j) — risk analysis, incident handling, continuity, supply-chain security, MFA, cryptography, training, effectiveness assessment — an all-hazards approach aligned with European and international standards, including ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002 [C3]. On the aviation side, Part-IS overlays specific requirements: an Information Security Management System (ISMS) with risk assessment (IS.I.OR.205), risk treatment (IS.I.OR.210), detection and response (IS.I.OR.220), an Information Security Management Manual (ISMM) and 5-year retention of records [C7]. The management body approves and oversees implementation (NIS2 Art. 20) and can be held liable for breaches [C15]. For Romanian airport operators, AACR (the Romanian Civil Aviation Authority) monitors Part-IS compliance, in cooperation with DNSC on the cybersecurity-training side (Modules 27 and 28 of PNPSAC, the National Civil Aviation Security Training Programme) [C18].

Recommended controls: NIS2 Art. 21(2)(a-j)Part-IS IS.I.OR.205-235ISO/IEC 27001:2022ICAO Annex 17 Std. 4.9.1AACR PNPSAC Mod. 27-28

Incident reporting on two parallel tracks (NIS2 Art. 23 + Part-IS IS.I.OR.230)

effort: high

For an aviation entity covered simultaneously by NIS2 and Part-IS, the same event can trigger two parallel reporting flows. NIS2 Art. 23: early warning to the CSIRT (DNSC) within 24 hours of awareness, incident notification within 72 hours, final report within one month [C4]. Part-IS IS.I.OR.230: notification to the competent authority (AACR for Romanian entities) within 72 hours of an incident with aviation-safety impact, plus follow-up reports [C7]. In addition, Reg. (EC) 300/2008 and ICAO Annex 17 require reporting of acts of unlawful interference, including cyber, through aviation-security channels (in Romania: the Ministry of Transport + AACR) [C12][C13]. An airport CISO needs a single runbook that feeds, in parallel, the DNSC form + the AACR form + reporting to EATM-CERT EUROCONTROL where the incident affects ATM [C14].

Recommended controls: NIS2 Art. 23(4)Part-IS IS.I.OR.230Reg. (EC) 300/2008ICAO Annex 17EATM-CERT EUROCONTROL

Supply chain security (NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d) + Part-IS supply chain)

effort: medium

The aviation industry runs on deep supply chains: avionics, onboard software, ATM systems, check-in software (vMUSE, Altea), bag-drop platforms, PSS (Passenger Service Systems), MRO maintenance systems. Recent incidents confirm the supply-chain blast radius: Collins Aerospace ransomware (September 2025) stopped check-in at Heathrow, Brussels and Berlin Brandenburg, forcing manual processing for hours [I1]; SITA in 2021 exposed data for 4.5 million Air India passengers [I3]; LockBit at Boeing in 2023 leaked 50 GB of parts and distribution data [I2]. NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d) requires assessment of critical suppliers, contractual clauses and continuous monitoring [C3]. For Part-IS, the operator remains responsible even when it delegates ICT/ISMS functions — IS.I.OR.235 [C7]. Practical recommendation: SBOM for avionics and airport software, contractual notification clauses <24h, exit strategy for hyperscalers and PSS providers.

Recommended controls: NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d)Part-IS IS.I.OR.235Reg. (EU) 2022/1645 Art. 3EATM-CERT supply chain alerts

Operational continuity and cyber resilience (NIS2 Art. 21(2)(c) + ICAO Doc 10213)

effort: high

Aviation runs 24/7, with zero margin for downtime in ATM and limited margin in airport operations. NIS2 Art. 21(2)(c) requires business continuity, backup management and crisis management [C3]. ICAO Doc 10213 (Global Cyber Risk Considerations) and the EUROCONTROL Cybersecurity Strategy assume that attacks will happen — the focus is on reducing the magnitude and duration of impact [C13][C14]. For ANSPs (ROMATSA), EATM-CERT collects and distributes cyber intelligence, coordinates a pan-European response, and supports national CERTs [C14]. The Air Serbia 2025 lesson: the absence of security logs prevented determination of the exact time of intrusion; continuity plans that have not been exercised on a real runbook do not work under pressure [I6]. Documented RTO/RPO per critical function (ATC, surveillance, communications, check-in, bag drop, AODB, BHS), with annual testing as a minimum.

Recommended controls: NIS2 Art. 21(2)(c)Part-IS IS.I.OR.220ICAO Doc 10213EUROCONTROL Cyber Strategy

Governance, management accountability and training (NIS2 Art. 20 + AACR PNPSAC Mod. 27-28)

effort: medium

NIS2 Art. 20 requires the management body to approve risk-management measures, to oversee implementation, and may be held liable for breaches; Member States may impose temporary prohibitions on exercising managerial functions for essential entities [C15]. In Romania, OUG 155/2024 transposed these provisions [C6]. Part-IS adds the 'accountable manager' figure — the person with authority to ensure resources and the security policy [C7]. Aviation-specific: AACR, in consultation with DNSC, sets the content of Module 27 (Cybersecurity awareness training) and Module 28 (Specific cybersecurity training) of PNPSAC (the National Civil Aviation Security Training Programme) [C18]. For essential entities, mandatory periodic training for personnel with access to critical systems (control tower, AODB, BHS, airport security systems, MRO systems).

Recommended controls: NIS2 Art. 20Part-IS Accountable ManagerOUG 155/2024 Art. 18-20PNPSAC Mod. 27PNPSAC Mod. 28

📰 Real incidents, concrete lessons

Collins Aerospace (RTX) — ARINC vMUSE/cMUSE

2025 · EU+UK (Heathrow, Brussels, Berlin Brandenburg)

Type: Ransomware (claimed by the Everest group) against the check-in and bag drop system

Impact: Attack started on 19 September 2025; ENISA officially confirmed it as ransomware. Hundreds of flights cancelled and major delays, the airports reverted to manual processing. Brussels asked for the cancellation of nearly half its flights in a single day; Heathrow operated close to normal through contingencies. The UK NCA arrested a suspect in West Sussex under the Computer Misuse Act.

Lesson: A single ICT vendor on a critical operational function = a single point of failure across multiple airports. NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d) and Part-IS supply chain (IS.I.OR.235) require concentration assessment, rapid-notification clauses and tested manual-bypass plans.

Public source ↗

Boeing — parts and distribution business

2023 · United States (global impact on the aerospace supply chain)

Type: LockBit ransomware, exploiting CVE-2023-4966 (CitrixBleed)

Impact: Listed on the LockBit leak site on 28 October 2023; Boeing confirmed the intrusion on 2 November 2023; on 10 November 2023 LockBit dumped about 50 GB of data after negotiations failed. Impact on the aircraft-parts supply chain.

Lesson: Patch management on known vulnerabilities (Citrix Bleed had a fix from 10 October 2023). NIS2 Art. 21(2)(e) and Part-IS IS.I.OR.205 require timely vulnerability handling, with critical scope (production, internet-exposed systems) prioritised.

Public source ↗

SITA Passenger Service System (PSS) — Air India + Lufthansa + American Airlines + Star Alliance

2021 · Global (EU + Asia + United States)

Type: Cyberattack described as 'highly sophisticated but limited', identified on 24 February 2021

Impact: Air India confirmed 4.5 million passengers affected, with data from the period 26 August 2011 to 3 February 2021: name, date of birth, passport, ticket, frequent flyer status. SITA has more than 2,500 aviation customers across 200+ countries. Air India only published its statement naming SITA on 15 May 2021 — a communication delay of five weeks.

Lesson: A PSS vendor = a single point of failure for dozens of airlines. NIS2 Art. 23 requires notification to the CSIRT within 24h/72h; the five-week Air India delay would today cumulate both NIS2 and GDPR (Art. 33) sanctions.

Public source ↗

EUROCONTROL + 7 German airports (Düsseldorf, Hanover, Dortmund, Erfurt, Nürnberg, Baden-Baden + Bremen)

2023 · EU (Belgium / Germany)

Type: Hacktivist DDoS by KillNet / Anonymous Sudan / Anonymous Russia

Impact: February 2023: public websites of German airports taken down, with no impact on flights or operational systems. April 2023: a "100-hour EUROCONTROL marathon" announced by KillNet; internal and external communications affected for 2,000 staff who moved to commercial channels; air-traffic safety unaffected. Similar cases in the United States (October 2022) and Germany (January 2023).

Lesson: Pro-Russian hacktivist DDoS = a recurring vector against public-facing transport sites. Anti-DDoS at the edge, WAF for public applications, segregation of public networks from operational networks — minimum requirements under NIS2 Art. 21(2)(a) and (e).

Public source ↗

Air Serbia (JAT)

2025 · Serbia (regional operator, connections to Bucharest / Cluj)

Type: Cyberattack involving Active Directory compromise

Impact: An internal memo of 10 July 2025 delayed the distribution of June 2025 payslips; salaries were paid but the PDFs were inaccessible. On 14 July 2025, the internal team had not managed to eradicate access; the absence of security logs prevented determination of the exact time of intrusion, estimated to the early days of July 2025. High risk of personal-data compromise.

Lesson: Logs and telemetry on AD = a precondition for investigation. NIS2 Art. 21(2)(a) (risk analysis) and (i) (monitoring) require centralised logging with sufficient retention. If you cannot answer "when did the attacker get in?", you cannot meet Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).

Public source ↗

⚠️ Typical threats

  • • Ransomware pe sisteme bagaje/check-in (vezi Cathay 2024)
  • • DDoS pe sisteme online check-in
  • • Spoofing GPS / GNSS

💰 Maximum fines

Max 10 mil. EUR sau 2% cifra afaceri

📊 Romania compliance status

ROMATSA + aeroporturi (Otopeni, Cluj, Timișoara) sub auditul Q2 2026.

🛡️ How CAI Technology helps

📚 Adjacent regulations with overlap

Reg. Delegat (UE) 2022/1645 (Part-IS Delegated) · Directly applicable from 16 October 2025; does not require national transposition [C8]

For design and production organisations (Part-21) and aerodrome operators (Part-ADR), plus apron management service providers. For CN Aeroporturi Bucuresti, AIBC Cluj, AITS Timisoara and Iasi Airport — Part-IS Delegated becomes the main technical framework on aviation ISMS.

Reg. Impl. (UE) 2023/203 (Part-IS Implementing) · Directly applicable from 22 February 2026; does not require national transposition [C7]

For Part-145 (maintenance), Part-CAMO, Part-ORO (air carriers, although the AOC itself is excluded), Part-ATCO (controller training), Part-ATM/ANS (ROMATSA), ATO (training) organisations. Mandatory ISMM, 5-year record retention, 72h reporting to AACR for safety-impacting events. Romaero (Part-145) and the MRO arm of TAROM fall within scope.

Reg. (CE) 300/2008 — aviation security (anti-unlawful interference) · Applicable from 11 March 2008; national programmes in Romania via PNSAC + PNPSAC [C12]

The baseline framework for the protection of civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference, including cyber (through subsequent amendments). In Romania: the National Civil Aviation Security Programme (PNSAC) + the National Training Programme (PNPSAC), run by the Ministry of Transport and AACR. The cyber modules 27 and 28 are consulted with DNSC.

Reg. (UE) 2018/1139 — EASA Basic Regulation · Directly applicable from September 2018 [C11]

EASA's basic regulation, under which all the Part-* sub-regulations (Part-145, Part-CAMO, Part-ORO, Part-ATCO, Part-ATM/ANS, Part-ADR, Part-21) plus Part-IS are issued. For any Romanian aviation entity, technical compliance runs through this regulation + sub-acts.

Frequently asked

I am a regional airport in Romania (under 250,000 passengers/year). Am I in scope of NIS2?

Probably yes. NIS2 Art. 2 + Annex I list airport managing bodies as a sector of high criticality, and the default threshold is medium or large enterprise (>= 50 staff or >= EUR 10 million turnover / balance sheet) [C1]. Many regional airports exceed 50 staff. Below the threshold, DNSC can identify entities individually as critical and notify them — for Romanian airports with a strategic role (Iasi, Cluj, Timisoara) the probability is high [C6].

What is the practical relationship between NIS2 and Part-IS for an aviation entity?

Cumulative, not alternative. Under the Commission's guidance on Art. 4 NIS2, Part-IS is NOT 'lex specialis' — i.e. NIS2 obligations do not fall away when Part-IS applies [C9]. In practice: a single ISMS that satisfies both (many controls overlap with ISO/IEC 27001 [C3]), but two incident-reporting channels (DNSC for NIS2, AACR for Part-IS) [C4][C7]. EASA is working with the Commission on formal credit, but until then they coexist.

TAROM holds an AOC. Does it fall under Part-IS?

The AOC itself is NOT under Part-IS [C10]. But TAROM holds other EASA certificates: Part-145 for in-house maintenance, possibly ATO for training, Part-CAMO for continuing airworthiness management. For these parts of the organisation, Part-IS applies in full. In addition, TAROM remains under NIS2 as an air carrier — Annex I requires cyber risk management at company level, not only on the EASA-certified branches [C1][C10].

Who pays if an attack at the ICT vendor (Collins, SITA) stops my check-in?

You, as the operator, remain primarily responsible to DNSC, AACR and passengers — supply-chain risk is your responsibility, NOT the vendor's. NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d) requires evaluation of critical vendors, contractual clauses and monitoring [C3]. Part-IS IS.I.OR.235: the operator remains responsible even when it delegates functions [C7]. The Collins Aerospace 2025 incident [I1] showed that airports with a tested manual-bypass plan survived; those without did not. ICT vendor contracts must include rapid-notification clauses (<24h), audit and exit strategy.

Incident reporting deadlines to AACR and DNSC — exact?

Two parallel channels. NIS2 Art. 23 to the CSIRT (DNSC): early warning within 24 hours of awareness, notification within 72 hours, final report within one month [C4]. Part-IS IS.I.OR.230 to the competent authority (AACR): notification within 72 hours for incidents with aviation-safety impact, plus follow-up reports [C7]. For ATM/ATS incidents, parallel reporting to EATM-CERT EUROCONTROL for pan-European coordination [C14]. Practical recommendation: a single process that feeds both forms + EUROCONTROL automatically.

Maximum NIS2 fine ceiling for an essential airport?

Under NIS2 Art. 34: at least EUR 10,000,000 or 2% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher [C5]. For CN Aeroporturi Bucuresti, with revenues in good years exceeding EUR 100 million, the 2% ceiling may exceed EUR 10 million. Sanctions may be cumulative with those under GDPR Art. 83 (if the incident exposed personal data) and with AACR sanctions on the Part-IS / Reg. 300/2008 side (amounts set by national law — OUG 155/2024 + administrative acts).

Who is personally liable in the management of an airport / ANSP?

NIS2 Art. 20 requires the management body to approve risk-management measures, to oversee implementation and may be held liable; Member States may impose temporary prohibitions on exercising managerial functions for essential entities [C15]. In Romania, OUG 155/2024 transposed these provisions [C6]. Part-IS adds the 'accountable manager' figure — the person with authority to ensure resources and the security policy, who signs off the ISMS [C7]. At a personal level: the managing director + CISO + Part-IS accountable manager.

🔗 Official sources

Are you in the air transport sector?

Free NIS2 audit for companies with 50+ employees. We reply within 24 business hours.

Request audit →